Evaluating decision processes

I’m thinking about how decision-making can be predetermined and how criteria might not be always clear. It seems like there’s a lack of a professional committee, leading to heavy reliance on administrative orders.

Comparing domestic and foreign approaches highlights differences in communication, cost versus ROI, and public tolerance. Establishing a clear professional selection framework seems crucial, setting job descriptions, KPIs, and a structured process.

For transparency, I believe it’s important to publish selection criteria and a scoring sheet to avoid conflicts of interest. Lastly, having clear contract details would help ensure accountability and development.Proposing governance reforms

I’m thinking about addressing the idea of governance reforms, considering the notion of separating administrative issues from the organization. Creating an independent committee with veto power and transparency seems essential.

I want to offer a template for scoring criteria and processes that’s concise yet valuable, possibly using bullet points. I need to be cautious with politically sensitive discussions in China, but this is focused on sports governance, so it should be fine. I’ll finish by clarifying if the user prefers a short op-ed or a data-supported brief.