Considering user request
The user posted a Chinese sentence that translates to a media figure criticizing retired players becoming coaches, suggesting grassroots coaches should compete. They haven't asked a specific question, so they might want a summary, translation, or analysis. I think it's best to ask for clarification on how they'd like me to respond—whether they'd prefer a translation, a brief analysis, or examples from other countries. I'll keep my tone friendly and concise, suggesting possible ideas to make it easier for them.Analyzing coaching dynamics
I need to provide a balanced analysis regarding the claim that former players becoming coaches is a "vulgar clique." I can suggest mechanisms for open competition, like implementing licenses, transparent hiring practices, and performance metrics. It’s also essential to discuss mentorship and anti-nepotism policies.
I could include examples from other countries, plus pros and cons of ex-players versus grassroots coaches. Evaluating coaches through specific metrics is crucial, and I’ll emphasize meritocratic processes while steering clear of political content. It’s all about sports here!Preparing a concise response
First, I want to clarify what the user wants: a translation, summary, or analysis. It might be best to start with a brief analysis and then offer to expand on specific points. I can recommend measures like licensing, open recruitment, and trial periods with KPIs.

I’ll also include comparative coaching examples from Germany, Spain, England, and Japan. Keeping a neutral tone is essential, and I’ll finish by asking what specific angle they’d like—whether it's for debate prep or data on coaching in the Chinese Super League.Crafting a response in Chinese
Since the user wrote in Chinese, I can reply in the same language to enhance communication. I’ll keep my response concise and offer an op-ed outline that provides a balanced view along with actionable reform steps.

I’ll start with a brief summary on the topic, highlighting the issues with retired players transitioning to coaching versus grassroots coaches.
Then, I’ll present the pros and cons for both sides, followed by strategies for fair competition, like unified licensing and transparent recruitment processes. Lastly, I’ll offer to help with deliverables like outlines or templates if the user needs further assistance!
这是个老话题:名宿“顺位上岗” vs 草根“难见天日”。关键不在出身,而在培养—准入—竞聘—评估是否公开透明、以绩效为先。
观点速析
怎么让竞争更公平(可落地的机制)

他国做法参考

如果你要展开这个话题,我可以继续帮你:
你更想做哪种?或给我具体场景(职业队/青训/校园足球),我按场景细化指标与流程。